Can Trump’s “Board of Peace” Replace the UN?

As wars grind on from Gaza to Ukraine, the United Nations is once again under scrutiny — this time because of a new U.S.-led initiative that some fear could weaken its authority.

At the World Economic Forum in Davos, President Donald Trump unveiled his so-called Board of Peace, describing it as a bold effort to end global conflicts and deliver what he called “lasting peace.”

According to leaked draft plans cited by the BBC, the Board would be chaired by Trump himself, potentially for life, with sweeping powers to invite members, shape its mandate, and even name his successor.

While the initiative was originally linked to U.S.-led diplomacy around Gaza and referenced in a UN Security Council resolution, its scope has since expanded far beyond the Middle East.

Supporters argue the Board reflects frustration with a United Nations often paralyzed by vetoes and political gridlock. Critics warn it risks undermining the post-war international system by concentrating power outside the UN and around a single leader.

Several countries have expressed caution or declined to join, while others have welcomed the project as a pragmatic alternative to stalled diplomacy.

Trump has sent mixed signals, at times saying the Board would work “with” the UN, while also suggesting it could replace an institution he says has “never lived up to its potential.”